@article{Scavia-2019-Detroit,
title = "Detroit River phosphorus loads: Anatomy of a binational watershed",
author = "Scavia, Donald and
Bocaniov, Serghei A. and
Dagnew, Awoke and
Hu, Yao and
Kerkez, Branko and
Long, Christopher and
Muenich, Rebecca Logsdon and
Read, Jennifer and
Vaccaro, Lynn and
Wang, Yu Chen",
journal = "Journal of Great Lakes Research, Volume 45, Issue 6",
volume = "45",
number = "6",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
url = "https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G19-76002",
doi = "10.1016/j.jglr.2019.09.008",
pages = "1150--1161",
abstract = "Abstract As a result of increased harmful algal blooms and hypoxia in Lake Erie, the US and Canada revised their phosphorus loading targets under the 2012 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. The focus of this paper is the Detroit River and its watershed, a source of 25{\%} of the total phosphorus (TP) load to Lake Erie. Its load declined 37{\%} since 1998, due chiefly to improvements at the regional Great Lakes Water Authority Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) in Detroit and phosphorus sequestered by zebra and quagga mussels in Lake Huron. In addition to the 54{\%} of the load from Lake Huron, nonpoint sources contribute 57{\%} of the TP load and 50{\%} of the dissolved reactive phosphorus load, with the remaining balance from point sources. After Lake Huron, the largest source is the WRRF, which has already reduced its load by over 40{\%}. Currently, loads from Lake Huron and further reductions from the WRRF are not part of the reduction strategy, therefore remaining watershed sources will need to decline by 72{\%} to meet the Water Quality Agreement target - a daunting challenge. Because other urban sources are very small, most of the reduction would have to come from agriculturally-dominated lands. The most effective way to reduce those loads is to apply combinations of practices like cover crops, buffer strips, wetlands, and applying fertilizer below the soil surface on the lands with the highest phosphorus losses. However, our simulations suggest even extensive conservation on those lands may not be enough.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="Scavia-2019-Detroit">
<titleInfo>
<title>Detroit River phosphorus loads: Anatomy of a binational watershed</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Donald</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Scavia</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Serghei</namePart>
<namePart type="given">A</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bocaniov</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Awoke</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dagnew</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yao</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Branko</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kerkez</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Christopher</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Long</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Rebecca</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Logsdon</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Muenich</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jennifer</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Read</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Lynn</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Vaccaro</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yu</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Chen</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2019</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Journal of Great Lakes Research, Volume 45, Issue 6</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<issuance>continuing</issuance>
<publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Abstract As a result of increased harmful algal blooms and hypoxia in Lake Erie, the US and Canada revised their phosphorus loading targets under the 2012 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. The focus of this paper is the Detroit River and its watershed, a source of 25% of the total phosphorus (TP) load to Lake Erie. Its load declined 37% since 1998, due chiefly to improvements at the regional Great Lakes Water Authority Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) in Detroit and phosphorus sequestered by zebra and quagga mussels in Lake Huron. In addition to the 54% of the load from Lake Huron, nonpoint sources contribute 57% of the TP load and 50% of the dissolved reactive phosphorus load, with the remaining balance from point sources. After Lake Huron, the largest source is the WRRF, which has already reduced its load by over 40%. Currently, loads from Lake Huron and further reductions from the WRRF are not part of the reduction strategy, therefore remaining watershed sources will need to decline by 72% to meet the Water Quality Agreement target - a daunting challenge. Because other urban sources are very small, most of the reduction would have to come from agriculturally-dominated lands. The most effective way to reduce those loads is to apply combinations of practices like cover crops, buffer strips, wetlands, and applying fertilizer below the soil surface on the lands with the highest phosphorus losses. However, our simulations suggest even extensive conservation on those lands may not be enough.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">Scavia-2019-Detroit</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.jglr.2019.09.008</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G19-76002</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2019</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>45</number></detail>
<detail type="issue"><number>6</number></detail>
<extent unit="page">
<start>1150</start>
<end>1161</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Journal Article
%T Detroit River phosphorus loads: Anatomy of a binational watershed
%A Scavia, Donald
%A Bocaniov, Serghei A.
%A Dagnew, Awoke
%A Hu, Yao
%A Kerkez, Branko
%A Long, Christopher
%A Muenich, Rebecca Logsdon
%A Read, Jennifer
%A Vaccaro, Lynn
%A Wang, Yu Chen
%J Journal of Great Lakes Research, Volume 45, Issue 6
%D 2019
%V 45
%N 6
%I Elsevier BV
%F Scavia-2019-Detroit
%X Abstract As a result of increased harmful algal blooms and hypoxia in Lake Erie, the US and Canada revised their phosphorus loading targets under the 2012 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. The focus of this paper is the Detroit River and its watershed, a source of 25% of the total phosphorus (TP) load to Lake Erie. Its load declined 37% since 1998, due chiefly to improvements at the regional Great Lakes Water Authority Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) in Detroit and phosphorus sequestered by zebra and quagga mussels in Lake Huron. In addition to the 54% of the load from Lake Huron, nonpoint sources contribute 57% of the TP load and 50% of the dissolved reactive phosphorus load, with the remaining balance from point sources. After Lake Huron, the largest source is the WRRF, which has already reduced its load by over 40%. Currently, loads from Lake Huron and further reductions from the WRRF are not part of the reduction strategy, therefore remaining watershed sources will need to decline by 72% to meet the Water Quality Agreement target - a daunting challenge. Because other urban sources are very small, most of the reduction would have to come from agriculturally-dominated lands. The most effective way to reduce those loads is to apply combinations of practices like cover crops, buffer strips, wetlands, and applying fertilizer below the soil surface on the lands with the highest phosphorus losses. However, our simulations suggest even extensive conservation on those lands may not be enough.
%R 10.1016/j.jglr.2019.09.008
%U https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G19-76002
%U https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2019.09.008
%P 1150-1161
Markdown (Informal)
[Detroit River phosphorus loads: Anatomy of a binational watershed](https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G19-76002) (Scavia et al., GWF 2019)
ACL
- Donald Scavia, Serghei A. Bocaniov, Awoke Dagnew, Yao Hu, Branko Kerkez, Christopher Long, Rebecca Logsdon Muenich, Jennifer Read, Lynn Vaccaro, and Yu Chen Wang. 2019. Detroit River phosphorus loads: Anatomy of a binational watershed. Journal of Great Lakes Research, Volume 45, Issue 6, 45(6):1150–1161.
