@article{Macrae-2021-One,
title = "One size does not fit all: Toward regional conservation practice guidance to reduce phosphorus loss risk in the Lake Erie watershed",
author = "Macrae, Merrin L. and
Jarvie, Helen P. and
Brouwer, Roy and
Gunn, Grant and
Reid, Keith and
Joosse, Pam and
King, Kevin W. and
Kleinman, Peter J. A. and
Smith, Doug and
Williams, Mark R. and
Zwonitzer, Martha and
Macrae, Merrin L. and
Jarvie, Helen P. and
Brouwer, Roy and
Gunn, Grant and
Reid, Keith and
Joosse, Pam and
King, Kevin W. and
Kleinman, Peter J. A. and
Smith, Doug and
Williams, Mark R. and
Zwonitzer, Martha",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Quality, Volume 50, Issue 3",
volume = "50",
number = "3",
year = "2021",
publisher = "Wiley",
url = "https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G21-5001",
doi = "10.1002/jeq2.20218",
pages = "529--546",
abstract = "Agricultural phosphorus (P) losses to surface water bodies remain a global eutrophication concern, despite the application of conservation practices on farm fields. Although it is generally agreed upon that the use of multiple conservation practices ({``}stacking{''}) will lead to greater improvements to water quality, this may not be cost effective to farmers, reducing the likelihood of adoption. At present, wholesale recommendations of conservation practices are given; however, the application of specific conservation practices in certain environments (e.g., no-till with surface application, cover crops) may not be effective and can even lead to unintended consequences. In this paper, we present the Lake Erie watershed as a case study. The Lake Erie watershed contains regions with unique physical geographies that include differences in climate, soil, topography, and land use, which have implications for both P transport from agricultural fields and the efficacy of conservation practices in mitigating P losses. We define major regions within the Lake Erie watershed where common strategies for conservation practice implementation are appropriate, and we propose a five-step plan for bringing regionally tailored, adaptive, and cost-conscious conservation practice into watershed planning. Although this paper is specific to the Lake Erie watershed, our framework can be transferred across broader geographic regions to provide guidance for watershed planning.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="Macrae-2021-One">
<titleInfo>
<title>One size does not fit all: Toward regional conservation practice guidance to reduce phosphorus loss risk in the Lake Erie watershed</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Merrin</namePart>
<namePart type="given">L</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Macrae</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Helen</namePart>
<namePart type="given">P</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jarvie</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Roy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Brouwer</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Grant</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gunn</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Keith</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Reid</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Pam</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Joosse</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kevin</namePart>
<namePart type="given">W</namePart>
<namePart type="family">King</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Peter</namePart>
<namePart type="given">J</namePart>
<namePart type="given">A</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kleinman</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Doug</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Smith</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mark</namePart>
<namePart type="given">R</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Williams</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Martha</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zwonitzer</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2021</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Journal of Environmental Quality, Volume 50, Issue 3</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<issuance>continuing</issuance>
<publisher>Wiley</publisher>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Agricultural phosphorus (P) losses to surface water bodies remain a global eutrophication concern, despite the application of conservation practices on farm fields. Although it is generally agreed upon that the use of multiple conservation practices (“stacking”) will lead to greater improvements to water quality, this may not be cost effective to farmers, reducing the likelihood of adoption. At present, wholesale recommendations of conservation practices are given; however, the application of specific conservation practices in certain environments (e.g., no-till with surface application, cover crops) may not be effective and can even lead to unintended consequences. In this paper, we present the Lake Erie watershed as a case study. The Lake Erie watershed contains regions with unique physical geographies that include differences in climate, soil, topography, and land use, which have implications for both P transport from agricultural fields and the efficacy of conservation practices in mitigating P losses. We define major regions within the Lake Erie watershed where common strategies for conservation practice implementation are appropriate, and we propose a five-step plan for bringing regionally tailored, adaptive, and cost-conscious conservation practice into watershed planning. Although this paper is specific to the Lake Erie watershed, our framework can be transferred across broader geographic regions to provide guidance for watershed planning.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">Macrae-2021-One</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.1002/jeq2.20218</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G21-5001</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2021</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>50</number></detail>
<detail type="issue"><number>3</number></detail>
<extent unit="page">
<start>529</start>
<end>546</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Journal Article
%T One size does not fit all: Toward regional conservation practice guidance to reduce phosphorus loss risk in the Lake Erie watershed
%A Macrae, Merrin L.
%A Jarvie, Helen P.
%A Brouwer, Roy
%A Gunn, Grant
%A Reid, Keith
%A Joosse, Pam
%A King, Kevin W.
%A Kleinman, Peter J. A.
%A Smith, Doug
%A Williams, Mark R.
%A Zwonitzer, Martha
%J Journal of Environmental Quality, Volume 50, Issue 3
%D 2021
%V 50
%N 3
%I Wiley
%F Macrae-2021-One
%X Agricultural phosphorus (P) losses to surface water bodies remain a global eutrophication concern, despite the application of conservation practices on farm fields. Although it is generally agreed upon that the use of multiple conservation practices (“stacking”) will lead to greater improvements to water quality, this may not be cost effective to farmers, reducing the likelihood of adoption. At present, wholesale recommendations of conservation practices are given; however, the application of specific conservation practices in certain environments (e.g., no-till with surface application, cover crops) may not be effective and can even lead to unintended consequences. In this paper, we present the Lake Erie watershed as a case study. The Lake Erie watershed contains regions with unique physical geographies that include differences in climate, soil, topography, and land use, which have implications for both P transport from agricultural fields and the efficacy of conservation practices in mitigating P losses. We define major regions within the Lake Erie watershed where common strategies for conservation practice implementation are appropriate, and we propose a five-step plan for bringing regionally tailored, adaptive, and cost-conscious conservation practice into watershed planning. Although this paper is specific to the Lake Erie watershed, our framework can be transferred across broader geographic regions to provide guidance for watershed planning.
%R 10.1002/jeq2.20218
%U https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G21-5001
%U https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20218
%P 529-546
Markdown (Informal)
[One size does not fit all: Toward regional conservation practice guidance to reduce phosphorus loss risk in the Lake Erie watershed](https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G21-5001) (Macrae et al., GWF 2021)
ACL
- Merrin L. Macrae, Helen P. Jarvie, Roy Brouwer, Grant Gunn, Keith Reid, Pam Joosse, Kevin W. King, Peter J. A. Kleinman, Doug Smith, Mark R. Williams, Martha Zwonitzer, Merrin L. Macrae, Helen P. Jarvie, Roy Brouwer, Grant Gunn, Keith Reid, Pam Joosse, Kevin W. King, Peter J. A. Kleinman, et al.. 2021. One size does not fit all: Toward regional conservation practice guidance to reduce phosphorus loss risk in the Lake Erie watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality, Volume 50, Issue 3, 50(3):529–546.
