2023
DOI
bib
abs
Evaluating photosynthetic activity across Arctic-Boreal land cover types using solar-induced fluorescence
Rui Cheng,
Troy S. Magney,
Erica L Orcutt,
Zoe Pierrat,
Philipp Köhler,
D. R. Bowling,
M. Syndonia Bret‐Harte,
E. S. Euskirchen,
Martin Jung,
Hideki Kobayashi,
Adrian V. Rocha,
Oliver Sonnentag,
J. Stutz,
Sophia Walther,
Donatella Zona,
Christian Frankenberg,
Rui Cheng,
Troy S. Magney,
Erica L Orcutt,
Zoe Pierrat,
Philipp Köhler,
D. R. Bowling,
M. Syndonia Bret‐Harte,
E. S. Euskirchen,
Martin Jung,
Hideki Kobayashi,
Adrian V. Rocha,
Oliver Sonnentag,
J. Stutz,
Sophia Walther,
Donatella Zona,
Christian Frankenberg
Environmental Research Letters, Volume 17, Issue 11
Abstract Photosynthesis of terrestrial ecosystems in the Arctic-Boreal region is a critical part of the global carbon cycle. Solar-induced chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF), a promising proxy for photosynthesis with physiological insight, has been used to track gross primary production (GPP) at regional scales. Recent studies have constructed empirical relationships between SIF and eddy covariance-derived GPP as a first step to predicting global GPP. However, high latitudes pose two specific challenges: (a) Unique plant species and land cover types in the Arctic–Boreal region are not included in the generalized SIF-GPP relationship from lower latitudes, and (b) the complex terrain and sub-pixel land cover further complicate the interpretation of the SIF-GPP relationship. In this study, we focused on the Arctic-Boreal vulnerability experiment (ABoVE) domain and evaluated the empirical relationships between SIF for high latitudes from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) and a state-of-the-art machine learning GPP product (FluxCom). For the first time, we report the regression slope, linear correlation coefficient, and the goodness of the fit of SIF-GPP relationships for Arctic-Boreal land cover types with extensive spatial coverage. We found several potential issues specific to the Arctic-Boreal region that should be considered: (a) unrealistically high FluxCom GPP due to the presence of snow and water at the subpixel scale; (b) changing biomass distribution and SIF-GPP relationship along elevational gradients, and (c) limited perspective and misrepresentation of heterogeneous land cover across spatial resolutions. Taken together, our results will help improve the estimation of GPP using SIF in terrestrial biosphere models and cope with model-data uncertainties in the Arctic-Boreal region.
DOI
bib
abs
Evaluating photosynthetic activity across Arctic-Boreal land cover types using solar-induced fluorescence
Rui Cheng,
Troy S. Magney,
Erica L Orcutt,
Zoe Pierrat,
Philipp Köhler,
D. R. Bowling,
M. Syndonia Bret‐Harte,
E. S. Euskirchen,
Martin Jung,
Hideki Kobayashi,
Adrian V. Rocha,
Oliver Sonnentag,
J. Stutz,
Sophia Walther,
Donatella Zona,
Christian Frankenberg,
Rui Cheng,
Troy S. Magney,
Erica L Orcutt,
Zoe Pierrat,
Philipp Köhler,
D. R. Bowling,
M. Syndonia Bret‐Harte,
E. S. Euskirchen,
Martin Jung,
Hideki Kobayashi,
Adrian V. Rocha,
Oliver Sonnentag,
J. Stutz,
Sophia Walther,
Donatella Zona,
Christian Frankenberg
Environmental Research Letters, Volume 17, Issue 11
Abstract Photosynthesis of terrestrial ecosystems in the Arctic-Boreal region is a critical part of the global carbon cycle. Solar-induced chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF), a promising proxy for photosynthesis with physiological insight, has been used to track gross primary production (GPP) at regional scales. Recent studies have constructed empirical relationships between SIF and eddy covariance-derived GPP as a first step to predicting global GPP. However, high latitudes pose two specific challenges: (a) Unique plant species and land cover types in the Arctic–Boreal region are not included in the generalized SIF-GPP relationship from lower latitudes, and (b) the complex terrain and sub-pixel land cover further complicate the interpretation of the SIF-GPP relationship. In this study, we focused on the Arctic-Boreal vulnerability experiment (ABoVE) domain and evaluated the empirical relationships between SIF for high latitudes from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) and a state-of-the-art machine learning GPP product (FluxCom). For the first time, we report the regression slope, linear correlation coefficient, and the goodness of the fit of SIF-GPP relationships for Arctic-Boreal land cover types with extensive spatial coverage. We found several potential issues specific to the Arctic-Boreal region that should be considered: (a) unrealistically high FluxCom GPP due to the presence of snow and water at the subpixel scale; (b) changing biomass distribution and SIF-GPP relationship along elevational gradients, and (c) limited perspective and misrepresentation of heterogeneous land cover across spatial resolutions. Taken together, our results will help improve the estimation of GPP using SIF in terrestrial biosphere models and cope with model-data uncertainties in the Arctic-Boreal region.
2020
DOI
bib
abs
Seasonal variation in the canopy color of temperate evergreen conifer forests
Bijan Seyednasrollah,
D. R. Bowling,
Rui Cheng,
Barry A. Logan,
Troy S. Magney,
Christian Frankenberg,
Julia C. Yang,
Adam M. Young,
Koen Hufkens,
M. Altaf Arain,
T. Andrew Black,
Peter D. Blanken,
Rosvel Bracho,
Rachhpal S. Jassal,
David Y. Hollinger,
B. E. Law,
Zoran Nesic,
Andrew D. Richardson
New Phytologist, Volume 229, Issue 5
Evergreen conifer forests are the most prevalent land cover type in North America. Seasonal changes in the color of evergreen forest canopies have been documented with near-surface remote sensing, but the physiological mechanisms underlying these changes, and the implications for photosynthetic uptake, have not been fully elucidated. Here, we integrate on-the-ground phenological observations, leaf-level physiological measurements, near surface hyperspectral remote sensing and digital camera imagery, tower-based CO2 flux measurements, and a predictive model to simulate seasonal canopy color dynamics. We show that seasonal changes in canopy color occur independently of new leaf production, but track changes in chlorophyll fluorescence, the photochemical reflectance index, and leaf pigmentation. We demonstrate that at winter-dormant sites, seasonal changes in canopy color can be used to predict the onset of canopy-level photosynthesis in spring, and its cessation in autumn. Finally, we parameterize a simple temperature-based model to predict the seasonal cycle of canopy greenness, and we show that the model successfully simulates interannual variation in the timing of changes in canopy color. These results provide mechanistic insight into the factors driving seasonal changes in evergreen canopy color and provide opportunities to monitor and model seasonal variation in photosynthetic activity using color-based vegetation indices.