2020
DOI
bib
abs
Modeling the impacts of diffuse light fraction on photosynthesis in ORCHIDEE (v5453) land surface model
Yuan Zhang,
Ana Bastos,
Fabienne Maignan,
Daniel S. Goll,
Oliviér Boucher,
Laurent Li,
Alessandro Cescatti,
Nicolas Vuichard,
Xiuzhi Chen,
Christof Ammann,
M. Altaf Arain,
T. Andrew Black,
Bogdan H. Chojnicki,
Tomomichi Kato,
Ivan Mammarella,
Leonardo Montagnani,
Olivier Roupsard,
María José Sanz,
Lukas Siebicke,
Marek Urbaniak,
Francesco Primo Vaccari,
Georg Wohlfahrt,
Will Woodgate,
Philippe Ciais
Geoscientific Model Development, Volume 13, Issue 11
Abstract. Aerosol- and cloud-induced changes in diffuse light have important impacts on the global land carbon cycle, as they alter light distribution and photosynthesis in vegetation canopies. However, this effect remains poorly represented or evaluated in current land surface models. Here, we add a light partitioning module and a new canopy light transmission module to the ORCHIDEE (Organising Carbon and Hydrology In Dynamic Ecosystems) land surface model (trunk version, v5453) and use the revised model, ORCHIDEE_DF, to estimate the fraction of diffuse light and its effect on gross primary production (GPP) in a multilayer canopy. We evaluate the new parameterizations using flux observations from 159 eddy covariance sites over the globe. Our results show that, compared with the original model, ORCHIDEE_DF improves the GPP simulation under sunny conditions and captures the observed higher photosynthesis under cloudier conditions in most plant functional types (PFTs). Our results also indicate that the larger GPP under cloudy conditions compared with sunny conditions is mainly driven by increased diffuse light in the morning and in the afternoon as well as by a decreased vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and decreased air temperature at midday. The observations show that the strongest positive effects of diffuse light on photosynthesis are found in the range from 5 to 20 ∘C and at a VPD < 1 kPa. This effect is found to decrease when the VPD becomes too large or the temperature falls outside of the abovementioned range, which is likely due to the increasing stomatal resistance to leaf CO2 uptake. ORCHIDEE_DF underestimates the diffuse light effect at low temperature in all PFTs and overestimates this effect at high temperature and at a high VPD in grasslands and croplands. The new model has the potential to better investigate the impact of large-scale aerosol changes and long-term changes in cloudiness on the terrestrial carbon budget, both in the historical period and in the context of future air quality policies and/or climate engineering.
2019
DOI
bib
abs
Global vegetation biomass production efficiency constrained by models and observations
Yue He,
Shushi Peng,
Yongwen Liu,
Xiangyi Li,
Kai Wang,
Philippe Ciais,
M. Altaf Arain,
Yuanyuan Fang,
Joshua B. Fisher,
Daniel S. Goll,
Daniel J. Hayes,
D. N. Huntzinger,
Akihiko Ito,
Atul K. Jain,
Ivan A. Janssens,
Jiafu Mao,
Matteo Campioli,
A. M. Michalak,
Changhui Peng,
Josep Peñuelas,
Benjamin Poulter,
Dahe Qin,
D. M. Ricciuto,
Kevin Schaefer,
Christopher R. Schwalm,
Xiaoying Shi,
Hanqin Tian,
Sara Vicca,
Yaxing Wei,
Ning Zeng,
Qiuan Zhu
Global Change Biology, Volume 26, Issue 3
Plants use only a fraction of their photosynthetically derived carbon for biomass production (BP). The biomass production efficiency (BPE), defined as the ratio of BP to photosynthesis, and its variation across and within vegetation types is poorly understood, which hinders our capacity to accurately estimate carbon turnover times and carbon sinks. Here, we present a new global estimation of BPE obtained by combining field measurements from 113 sites with 14 carbon cycle models. Our best estimate of global BPE is 0.41 ± 0.05, excluding cropland. The largest BPE is found in boreal forests (0.48 ± 0.06) and the lowest in tropical forests (0.40 ± 0.04). Carbon cycle models overestimate BPE, although models with carbon-nitrogen interactions tend to be more realistic. Using observation-based estimates of global photosynthesis, we quantify the global BP of non-cropland ecosystems of 41 ± 6 Pg C/year. This flux is less than net primary production as it does not contain carbon allocated to symbionts, used for exudates or volatile carbon compound emissions to the atmosphere. Our study reveals a positive bias of 24 ± 11% in the model-estimated BP (10 of 14 models). When correcting models for this bias while leaving modeled carbon turnover times unchanged, we found that the global ecosystem carbon storage change during the last century is decreased by 67% (or 58 Pg C).